EDA market performance in 2016 was strong across the board. As is typical, however, growth patterns still fluctuated among the many varied segments of this diverse market. The EDA market didn’t experience any surprises, but continued on a path of steady revenue increases. Long-term forecasts for all these market categories are trending well, especially for the leading edge ESL market segment.
]]>
RTL – The Changing Face of RTL
The RTL and Below Market Trends report includes market share, market forecast and analysis by sub-applications for the RTL and Below sub-applications. For more information, please review the detailed table of contents and figures.
Includes:
• 2017 Market Trends: ESL
• 2017 Market Trends: RTL and Below
• 2017 Market Trends: IC CAD
• 2017 Market Trends: PCB
The CAE Wallchart lists vendors by RT and Gate levels
]]>
This report will discuss the trends, 2013 market share and 2014 forecast for the Analog, Custom and RF sub-application sections of ESL, RTL, IC CAD and PCB applications of the EDA market.
Price: $2,000
2CheckOut.com Inc. (Ohio, USA) is a payment facilitator for goods and services provided by Gary Smith EDA, Inc.
]]>Gary Smith at DAC 2014: How System Design is Changing Electronics
]]>Where is the red button? What is the current state of ESL tools?
]]>
Download PDF[/message_box]
We have been trying to put together an ESL design flow for over a decade. It has been very elusive. If you want excuses, the flow is complex. The RTL flow initially had only four tools, a simulator, a synthesizer, an IC Layout tool and a static timing analyzer (V-S-M-Q in LSI Logic’s terms). The other issue was that we (I specifically) were all hardware guys and half of the flow is software. It took me years to learn how to speak software so I could start to communicate with the programmers. Fortunately, I had guys like Jason Andrews (Cadence) that could translate for me when I got stuck.]]>We have been trying to put together an ESL design flow for over a decade. It has been very elusive. If you want excuses, the flow is complex. The RTL flow initially had only four tools, a simulator, a synthesizer, an IC Layout tool and a static timing analyzer (V-S-M-Q in LSI Logic’s terms). The other issue was that we (I specifically) were all hardware guys and half of the flow is software. It took me years to learn how to speak software so I could start to communicate with the programmers. Fortunately, I had guys like Jason Andrews (Cadence) that could translate for me when I got stuck.
Finally at DAC 2013 there were enough of us that we could start connecting the dots. I actually never got everyone in the same room together at the same time but it still got done. The next week I went back to Silicon Valley and had lunch with Frank Schirrmeister and Jason to finish off the picture. Yes, the last problem was on the software side of the flow.
So next Monday, August 19th, Frank, Jason and Mike Gianfagna (a guy who focuses on the hardware side) will get together to try to explain what happened in a webinar (register). Frank wrote a blog with some background. Now we aren’t the geniuses (certainly not me) that did the hard work; we just all knew who those geniuses were. As the old saying goes, “It’s not what you know but who you know that counts”. Therefore, I will try to thank all of the visionary people that helped to put this flow together.
I hope you can join us and have some fun.
Please come to the webinar with your questions or ask them in the comments of this blog or send me an email to [email protected].
]]>